CHEMTRAILS:
KANTAS/GONTELITSAS
G.
Kantas
Professor,
you recently conducted a study on airborne microparticles and you detected
arsenic and other heavy metals in the atmosphere of the
Would
something like this be possible if we allow ourselves to think a little “conspiratorially”?
Perhaps this hypothesis should be investigated. I enclose for your perusal a
number of photographs I myself took and I would like you to tell me if these are
natural phenomena.
T.
Gontelitsas
Dear Mr. Kantas, I delayed my answer for a little so
that I could inform myself on the subject you
touch on ("chemtrails"). For
a start let me emphasize that our research pertained to microparticles in the
air of the city (a few metres above the ground) and not in the higher levels of
the atmosphere where the so-called trails
of some aircraft appear that are said to contain nanoparticles of certain metals
such as aluminium and barium.
Thus, if some such nanoparticles are being dispersed (something
I truly do not know, and your e-mail enjoined me to investigate the subject also)
or remain high in the atmosphere and do not descend to the earth so that we see
them in our samples (we did not see unusually high levels of either aluminium or
barium) or are so very tiny (formally nanoparticles) that we cannot detect them
despite the extreme sensitivity of the techniques we use here and in Germany.
Please note that our study, apart from pertaining, as previously mentioned, to
the air of the city, had to do with with microparticles and not with
nanoparticles (1
micrometre = 1000 nanometres). If
there are indeed, apart from microparticles, ALSO nanoparticles, then a much
more specialized study is required, which could be carried out by our scientific
team in the future if, naturally, funding were
found (from the university or some ministry or other body or even a private
individual). The present study, at
least on the subject of microparticles at a low altitude, was covered entirely (several
thousand euros) by a European programme entirely at our own initiative and in
collaboration with the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology. The
University, the state, etc. showed not the slightest interest. (...).
Of course, as I said before, if one wanted to go from microparticles to
nanoparticles, the cost would be much higher and in the event that sampling was
required from higher levels of the atmosphere, higher still. You
might say that if indeed there is a serious public health problem, as surmised,
from the supposed nanoparticles in the “chemtrails”, then it is worth making
available not only thousands but tens of thousands of euros. That is presumably
a matter for the bodies responsible for matters of atmospheric
pollution, i.e. essentially the Ministry for the Environment and Climate
Change and the Ministry of Health. We as university teachers and researches
cannot, and indeed are not obliged to, do anything more (if the European
programme had not been approved we would not have done even what we HAVE done
– essentially out of research curiosity and personal interest).
(in Greek “ευαισθησία”) When it comes to
microparticles, and also nanoparticles, the ball is in the court of the
responsible authorities and they should notify citizens accordingly. If they do
not have the scientific wherewithal we (in conjunction with our German
colleagues) could quite well conduct the research on the proviso that we secure
financial support and the project is assigned to us.
What I do not know, also, is whether other research
bodies (irrespective of the fact that the responsible body should be the
Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change) already have programmes and
funding for research, with emphasis on heavy metals and other toxic substances,
in atmospheric microparticles and indeed nanoparticles, both at lower and higher
levels in the atmosphere of Athens. From
what I see
on the
Internet you
have communicated
with the
I would also be curious to know whether there is a
Ministry of Environment and Climate Change position or view, because at least on
the subject of the microparticles in the lower layers there was a report in the
daily press, based on our study, mentioning arsenic and heavy metals.
Nevertheless, I reiterate that we have so far not detected (even on a small
scale) particles that would indicate the presence of the aluminium and barium
particles that are thought to be dispersed by the “chemtrails”.
As you understand, for particles on the nanoscale, and indeed at higher
levels in the atmosphere of
So officially the question is not posed, and let us
hope that future research on nanoparticles will show, at least for the region of
Athens, where we live, that this is the reality of the situation. Until then my
advice would be not to worry about the “chemtrails”.
There is enough, and more than enough, to affect your health in the
remaining atmospheric particles, which do not come from mysterious sources but
are the outcome of the modern Greek’s love of cement, tiles, excessive
building density, arson in the forests, driving automobiles and riding
motorcycles with defective exhausts (I, for one, rarely get a normal night’s
sleep in the suburb of Zografou where I live).
I hope I have been of some help.
T. Gontelitsas.